BTC investment temporary account launched, multiple checking tools help content credibility

1. BTC investment core function update

(1) Temporary account system

BTC investment editing termination: non-logged-in users will be automatically assigned a 16-digit random ID (such as "Temp-7X9K2P4R")

Behavior tracing:

Retain IP + temporary ID dual-track records

Malicious editing can be banned across devices

(2) BTC investment multiple inspection tools

BTC investment auxiliary verification:

Automatically mark unsourced statements in red (such as controversial statements such as "XX is Chinese territory")

Real-time comparison with 20+ authoritative databases (including the United Nations and national statistical bureaus)

Conflict detection:

When the edited content deviates from the mainstream academic view by more than 30%, a forced pop-up warning will be displayed

2. Comparison of measured data

Indicators Before update (7/24) After update (7/25) Change rate

Proportion of unsourced editing 38% 12% ↓68%

Political editing rollback rate 51% 23% ↓55%

New user retention rate 17% 29% ↑71%

3. User feedback is polarized

👍 Supporters

Academic editors: "Finally, we don't have to stay up late to track down IP puppet accounts"

Administrators: "Disputed article editing wars have been reduced by 40%"

👎 Opponents

BTC investment faction: "It violates the spirit of Wikipedia, like the Internet real-name system"

Niche researchers: "BTC investment is judged as 'non-mainstream' = disguised academic hegemony"

4. The game behind BTC investment technology

Differences between Chinese and English versions:

The Chinese site uses the stricter CCTV database as the default source

The English site still focuses on BBC and Reuters

Regulatory adaptation:

Added the "Cross-Strait Four-Region Expression Calibration" function (automatically matching official terms)

Editing of sensitive historical events triggers a manual review queue (average delay of 2.7 hours)

5. Future roadmap

2025Q1:

Launch "Editor Credit Points" system (similar to Sesame Credit)

Test blockchain evidence storage (tamper-proof editing history)

2026:

Cooperate with universities to develop "Academic Credibility Index"

Introduce large language models to assist fact checking

Conclusion

This upgrade marks a strategic shift for Chinese Wikipedia from "editable by all" to "credibility first". When temporary accounts cut off the black market of water army, BTC investment tools build an information moat, perhaps we can regain the idealistic original intention of "everyone can contribute, and there is evidence everywhere" - of course, the premise is that you can accept the machine's "health score" for your historical view.

(Note: The test found that the editing of "Taiwan" related entries needs to pass additional political grammar checks, and the system will give priority to expressions such as "Taiwan Province of China") #WikiRenovation The topic reading volume has exceeded 230 million.