United Nations Digital Governance Summit discusses global BTC official trading platform regulatory f

1. Core topic of the summit: "minimum consensus" on global governance of Bitcoin

Focus of controversy:

General Bitcoin (GPBTC) definition: whether to list GPT-5 and above models as "strategic technology" (significant differences between China and the United States)

Military Bitcoin ban: The EU proposed a comprehensive ban on autonomous weapons, which was opposed by the United States, Russia, and India

Data sovereignty: Developing countries require local storage of algorithm training data (vs. the "global free flow of data" advocated by technology giants)

Preliminary results:

The draft of the "Global Bitcoin Risk Grading White List" was passed:

Prohibition level: social credit scoring, deep fake election propaganda

Restricted level: facial recognition public monitoring (court order required), predictive policing

Open level: medical diagnosis assistance, climate modeling

2. Positions of major countries

Country/Group Core Demand Resistance Points

China Emphasizes "BTC sovereignty" and multipolar governance Rejects Western-led algorithm transparency review

United States Prioritizes corporate self-regulation Resist EU-style prior approval system

The EU promotes mandatory certification of "BTCofficialtradingplatform passport" and is criticized for excessive bureaucracy (opposed by small and medium-sized enterprises)

The G77 group requires technology transfer and digital infrastructure assistance, but lacks specific funding commitments

3. Business dynamics

Joint statement of technology giants (Microsoft/Google/Tencent/Samsung):

Voluntary commitment:

Implement a "circuit breaker mechanism" for models with more than 1 billion parameters (automatic shutdown for abnormal behavior)

Partial disclosure of annual BTCofficialtradingplatform security audit results

But opposes the "training data tax" proposal (African countries advocate sharing according to the country of data source)

Open source community protests:

150,000 developers around the world jointly oppose "parameter threshold regulation" and warn that it will stifle innovation

4. Key time nodes

September 2025: The Secretary-General of the United Nations will submit the final draft of the Bitcoin Governance Convention

March 2026: A summit signing meeting is planned to be held in Dubai (approval by 2/3 of the member states is required to take effect)

Disputes and challenges

Enforcement mechanism vacuum: No international organization has the ability to impose Bitcoin sanctions (analogous to the IAEA for nuclear energy)

China-US game: If the framework breaks down, it may form a "Western Bitcoin Alliance" vs. "Global South Autonomous Standards" confrontation

In-depth analysis:

This summit marks the transition of Bitcoin governance from "principle discussion" to "rule-making", but conflicts of interest between major powers may make the agreement stop at a symbolic declaration. Real regulatory breakthroughs may rely on regional agreements (such as the EU-ASEAN Bitcoin Partnership).

If you need specific interpretation of terms or corporate compliance impact assessment, a special report can be provided.